I think ignoring the obvious spreads throughout a crowd the opposite way a group of people who’s intent is unfavorable equalize the guilt by sharing it.
It’s almost like popular opinion wins whether it’s right or not.
Why approach an obviously emotionally [unstable?] man who is known for being combative in a frenzy?
What will the predictable outcome be?
What does this accomplish?
Unrefined vs Unrefined.
Don’t we learn in Elementary school two negatives produce negative?
We can take it a step further and say a negative multiplied by a negative equals a positive and if you divide a negative by a negative you get a positive.
How would this play out in the strategy of a protest?
Multiply the number of people divided by factions.
This calls for unity in the face of diversity corresponding objectively.
In a nutshell: More people. More philosophies. Functional events.